President Biden: ISIS-K, ‘We’ll hunt you down’

What happens when a 78-year-old who’s not razor sharp even on his best days goes a few weeks under immense pressure, without getting much sleep? This happens:

He came alive briefly for the inevitable moment when he swore vengeance against the perpetrators of today’s bloodbath, which killed 12 Americans and more than 90 Afghans at last count. But the logic is strained by the circumstances. Targeting jihadis to avenge fallen Americans is how we ended up in Afghanistan in the first place. And ISIS-K will have more freedom to maneuver with us out of the country than it would have had with us still there. “JSOC has been hunting ISIS-K for years, killing one top leader after another and helping government troops and the Taliban drive them out of most of their rural territory, leaving urban cells, mainly—hard to find and strike from ‘over the horizon,’ esp. without harming civilians,” reporter Wesley Morgan commented.

So we’re leaving Afghanistan but we now have some unfinished business there. We’re out but we’re in, sort of. “Biden’s position is that this sort of thing was always going to happen, which is why it caught us by surprise, which underscores why we’re leaving, and that’s why we need to strike back, so the mission will go on,” tweeted Charles Cooke, summarizing the absurdity.

“What assets will he use to hunt ISKP?” wondered Bill Roggio. “The @NDSAfghanistan is not more. The ANA is no more. What Afghan in his right mind would help the US now, after they were abandoned?

Speaking of unfinished business, he admitted that some Americans might still be on the ground after the last U.S. soldier has departed. The remainder of our mission to extricate every American from the country will be carried out by the Taliban. Which means the president is all but acknowledging that this will soon be a hostage crisis.

Roggio was aghast:

Don’t worry, we’re going to bribe them to the gills to secure the release of those Americans. The Taliban will be swimming in dough it needs to carry out reprisals against our abandoned Afghan allies courtesy of Uncle Sam. We’ll be paying for their executions, essentially.

The presser wound down with a tone-deaf exchange with Fox’s Peter Doocy in which Biden once again blamed Trump for forcing a withdrawal deadline on him which, he claimed, left him with the choice of either to pull out or face a Taliban onslaught that would have required reinserting thousands more American troops. But would it have?

Biden’s always fancied himself a foreign policy maven, absurdly. Well, if so, we have lots of financial leverage with the Taliban’s sponsor, Pakistan, and some financial leverage over the group itself. Since we’re going to end up bribing them anyway now to let Americans leave, we could have done a little creative diplomacy behind the scenes earlier this year to extend the withdrawal deadline to this coming winter, after “fighting season” was over, so that we could evacuate without haste.

The punchline to Biden claiming his hands were tied is that he already did flout Trump’s May 1 deadline, pushing it to September 11 because he wanted to be able to give a big speech congratulating himself for having Americans out of Afghanistan by the 20th anniversary of the attacks. He could have insisted on a New Year’s deadline instead, when the climate would have held off the Taliban. Why didn’t he?

At least he mourned the dead. Pelosi spoke earlier today and didn’t bother.


What are your thoughts on the story? Let us know in the comments below!

Previous articleNYC jail where Epstein killed himself is Closed
Next articleBiden’s temporary eviction ban Blocked by Supreme Court